What Gardiner Spring says here is true:
But be certain that you also heed this: The Necessity of Harnessing Excitement.
What Gardiner Spring says here is true:
But be certain that you also heed this: The Necessity of Harnessing Excitement.
There are a few articles that have already been written, so there will be some things going up this week on the blog. But posting and responding to comments will be slow. We are in Missouri visiting family for Christmas and will not be returning until Christmas Eve. Look forward to regular posting to resume on Monday.
Have a Merry Christmas!
A pastor will typically spend hours studying over a text to preach it on a Sunday morning. He wrestles through the difficult parts of the text. There is much sweat and labor that goes into preparing a message. Often times God will preach the sermon to our own hearts before we preach it to others.
I think the best sermons that I have preached have been the ones that have rocked my heart and soul before I even stand in the pulpit. When I feel the weight of a text and see the beauty of the gospel therein it causes me to be very passionate about the sermon I am getting ready to preach. I want others to have the same excitement for Jesus that this text/sermon has brought to my own heart. But if I’m not careful I can come across like this guy:
You don’t have to watch the whole thing to get the picture. Often times I think we preachers can come across this way. We are so amped up about the text that has sparked our hearts that we do not give time for our hearers to feel the weight of the text.
If you start out like this you’ll lose them. Just like in Mario Kart you can’t floor it out the gate. If you do you’ll end up burning rubber, creating a lot of smoke, and finding yourself distanced from the people you are trying to lead.
So, pace yourself. Allow your hearers to really feel the weight of the text themselves. Be patient. Heed these words by Zack Eswine:
…the problem is that the people have not had the preparation time given the preacher. They do not yet see the truth that has ignited the preacher’s grand style, so they wonder what has the preacher so worked up. but if the preacher will somewhat restrain while instructing so that all may see the light of the truth clearly, then when illustrating, the mixture of affection and explanation builds…Prophetic emotion describes what springs from a biblical truth rather than from the preacher’s energy, nervousness, or preferences. Truth unfelt and truth overfelt betrays its meaning. (Eswine, Preaching to a Post-Everything World, 129 emphasis mine)
I have been thinking a little recently about the church’s response to homelessness. Inevitably a couple of “pretty clear” passages come up when discussing this topic. One is Matthew 25:31-40 the other is James 2:14-17. These make it obvious, or so it is thought, that the church is not being faithful to the gospel unless it is feeding the poor, clothing the naked, giving clean water to the thirsty. But is that really what these texts are saying?
Consider Matthew 25:31-40:
[31] “When the Son of Man comes in his glory, and all the angels with him, then he will sit on his glorious throne. [32] Before him will be gathered all the nations, and he will separate people one from another as a shepherd separates the sheep from the goats. [33] And he will place the sheep on his right, but the goats on the left. [34] Then the King will say to those on his right, ‘Come, you who are blessed by my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world. [35] For I was hungry and you gave me food, I was thirsty and you gave me drink, I was a stranger and you welcomed me, [36] I was naked and you clothed me, I was sick and you visited me, I was in prison and you came to me.’ [37] Then the righteous will answer him, saying, ‘Lord, when did we see you hungry and feed you, or thirsty and give you drink? [38] And when did we see you a stranger and welcome you, or naked and clothe you? [39] And when did we see you sick or in prison and visit you?’ [40] And the King will answer them, ‘Truly, I say to you, as you did it to one of the least of these my brothers, you did it to me.’
(Matthew 25:31-40 ESV)
There you have it. If I do not give food, water, and clothes, to my fellow man then it’s just like I rejected Jesus. I can firmly place myself on the side of the unbelieving community. But if you notice in verse 40 Jesus says, “one of the least of these my brothers”. This is talking about how we respond to the needs of believers. This is not a blanket statement that you can put over all of humanity that says, “if you don’t give money or your home to a homeless guy then you don’t know Jesus”, or its less bold variations.
Now Consider James 2:14-17:
[14] What good is it, my brothers, if someone says he has faith but does not have works? Can that faith save him? [15] If a brother or sister is poorly clothed and lacking in daily food, [16] and one of you says to them, “Go in peace, be warmed and filled,” without giving them the things needed for the body, what good is that? [17] So also faith by itself, if it does not have works, is dead. (James 2:14-17 ESV)
This verse is often thought to be saying that if you see somebody that is in need but you don’t meet that need then it is obvious that your faith is dead. But is that really what this text is saying. The key word here is, “So also” in verse 17. This is an analogy. A well-wish without action is not really a well-wish. Just like faith without action is dead. That is what this text is saying. It may very well be that we can use this analogy and say that if we really want to care for the homeless of the world we will feed them and not simply pray for them. But this is NOT giving an example of dead faith.
So, as we continue to look at how we minister to the homeless and broken in our world let’s not do it with a faulty interpretation of these two verses…