Spotify and Discernment Bloggers

I love Spotify. I happily pay their premium price in order to provide endless music to every member of my immediate family. I also love them because they’ve recently blessed us with a free Google Mini. Though I’m confident it’s an underhanded way to spy on our family and keep us further addicted to Spotify, I don’t care—I’m living for the moment, baby.

But there is one thing which Spotify lacks which at times provides a great deal of frustration to me. I’m a very eclectic music listener. I’ll listen to worship music one moment and heavy metal the next. I’ll go from Christian hip hop to bluegrass covers without much of a thought. So I’ll admit that Spotify likely has a difficult time truly pinning down my musical interests. But there is one thing their algorithm lacks which I think would be super helpful; namely, nuance.

Awhile back I had a random hankerin’ to listen to La Cucaracha. So I did. That’s what Spotify is for. But that one moment of weakness left me having to repeatedly tell Spotify “no” to a vast selection of Spanish tracks. I’m sure the Spanish music is wonderful but apart from an interpreter I’m like a Baptist at a charismatic tongue-speaking service—I’ve got no idea what is going on. Likewise, a moment of weakness had me listening to a song by Beck. Now Spotify thinks I love the guy. Nuance, people!

No, I Don’t Like Beck!

Now I’m not writing today to complain about Spotify. I’m writing today to compare Spotify with discernment bloggers. Just like Spotify they often say right things and do things well. They point out things that the casual reader/listener might not notice. They see connections which few others see. Discernment done well is a great enrichment to the body of Christ. But there can also be a penchant for doing something as silly as putting Beck on the top of a guys playlist just because he happened to search for a Beck song a year and a half ago.

I can see why my musical genie would think I like Beck. I listened to lots of 90s alternative. I go through phases where I’m listening to nothing but folk. And truth be told my musical tastes are about as eclectic as Beck’s music. So it’d seem like a match made in heaven. And when I finally did a search for a Beck song, I’m sure they assumed this was their moment to propel him to the top of my charts. But I cannot stand Beck. And a charitable reading of my history of musical tastes would have queued them to the fact that I don’t really like techno nonsense or music by guys who wear girly hats and overindulgent sunglasses.

It’s the same way when discernment goes wrong. Rather than interpret a quote, article, or tweet against their entire body of work those who are doing discernment wrong will flip the script. They will put far more weight on the most recent writing and assume this person has fallen off the deep end. It’d be great if Spotify would think, “Hmmm, Mike doesn’t usually search for Beck. There must be some weird reason he is doing this today. I’ll only weigh this about the size of a feather”. Instead they give it disproportionate weight.

Yes, There is a Difference Between Scott Bradlee and Three College Kids Playing an Oboe

Generally Spotify gets my musical taste pretty closely. Some of their suggestions for music I’ll like are spot on, and I’ll find a new band that I absolutely love. But on occasion it’s just sheer silliness. Their algorithm lacks the ability to detect the difference between Scott Bradlee’s Postmodern Jukebox and a batch of three college students playing the oboe. It’s cute that they try to make those connections but they just don’t work. The thing which makes them great (helping me find new music) is also the thing which makes them incredibly head-scratching at times.

I suppose the same is true of discernment bloggers. Some of the connections which discernment bloggers make are suspect at best. It makes for great articles. Its wonderful when you are the guy to give latest scoop and expose the most recent false teacher. Such a thing plays really well in our culture of outrage. But it’s not patterned after biblical love. Love gives the benefit of the doubt.

So here is my solution for Spotify and discernment bloggers. Learn nuance. Don’t just assume you are right and chase down a story. Give the appropriate amount of weight to divergence. Really make sure that someone likes Beck before you pigeonhole a guy and make him have to keep listening to stuff that he doesn’t agree with. Spotify often has buttons which allows you to say “I like this song” or “I don’t like this song—stop playing it”. That’s helpful. It helps them to learn. Discernment bloggers should install one of those buttons somewhere. Because if I don’t agree with your representation of my position—it’s probably not that I’m a slippery snake of a heretic. It’s more likely that you haven’t pinned me down like you think you have.

Love bears all things, believes all things, hopes all things, endures all things.

Photo source: here

Read This! 12.27.18

Is a Plurality of Elders Necessary?

I’m not sure I would use the term “necessary” but it’s certainly helpful and conducive to a healthy environment.

2 Things to Remember When Setting Resolutions

Great reminders.

How Churches Can Help Women Study God’s Word

I appreciate the suggestions here.

Biblical Archaeology’s Top 10 Discoveries of 2018

If I had a couple of lives to live one of them would be as an archaeologist. 

My Top Blogs and Bloggers of 2018

Great list. I’d agree.

The Goal and Purpose of Ministry in the Local Church

Forgetting this is detrimental.

Beware the Idol of Parenting Success

This is a really tempting idol.

He Sought to Kill Sin with a Pen: John Owen

An enjoyable brief biography of Owen.

This is hilarious:

Top 12 Posts of 2018

2018 was kind of a difficult year for me. I say “kind of” because history tells me that I’ll likely look back on my 2018 and think that I was just being a big baby. Maybe in the future I’ll be in a position to share some of the reasons that 2018 was difficult. I share this only to say that I think my own season of depression and deep discouragement has impacted my writing. You can kind of tell how I’m doing mentally by the work that I produce. On occasion, when I’m battling the darkness, my writing will have a bit too much of a darker shade to it than is helpful. But really you can tell that I’m depressed when my pen gets silent and/or lazy. That is the case with a few stretches in 2018.

But even so, God is gracious and I believe He graciously allowed me to produce a few things which I enjoyed writing and that I believe could be beneficial to the church. I don’t care much for traffic so these weren’t necessarily the most visited posts of 2018—these are just the ones I think are the most important.

12. One Thing You Cannot Multi-Task. Spoiler alert. It’s prayer.

11. A Tip For Reading an OT Quotation. This seriously has changed the way I read the OT.

10. A Humbling and Yet Freeing Truth For Pastoral Ministry. I’m still trying to apply this one.

9. Thoughts on Underoath and An Open Letter to Spencer Chamberlain. This broke my heart.

8. The Apostle Paul Had Many Great Stories, Why Did He Tell This One? This was such a fun one to write and study for.

7. Why Would a Good God Not Heal? The last three sentences I need to keep reminding myself of on a daily basis.

6. Victimhood is a Fig Leaf This one didn’t seem to resonate with many folks, but it was so helpful for me to think through.

5. Proposing a New Awareness Month. I really wish this would happen. I need an awareness month like this.

4. How To Respond When You Get Punched in the Face. The Newton letter this article was inspired by was balm for my soul in a difficult season of pastoral ministry.

3. Doubt Always Looks For a Place to Land. Another one that didn’t get much traction but I think it’s such an important concept. More and more people are acting like doubt is a virtue. It’s not. It’s deadly.

2. The Gospel Gets the Last Word. This is the statement I’m placing over my 2018.

1. Let’s Just Be Honest and Admit We Hate One Another. This post went somewhat viral. I ended up being interviewed for a radio show in Southern California to talk about this article. Fun experience.

Jesus is good. No matter our production. No matter our season.

Photo source: here

Why Does The Apostle Peter Have So Many Names?

If you are new to reading the Bible you might be a little confused by a guy who seems to go by three or four different names. In Galatians 2 we read of a man named Peter who was the apostle to the Jews. And a couple verses later the author of Galatians (Paul) talks about opposing a guy named Cephas to his face. It’s the same guy. There is also a guy who James (the Lord’s brother) refers to as Simeon. This is the same guy who is also called Simon at various places in the gospels.

Cephas. Simon. Simeon. Peter. Simon Peter. Simon bar-Jonah.

Same dude.

So why does he have so many nicknames? The truth is that he really only has one nickname but the Bible (and those living in biblical times) spoke multiple languages.

Simon (or Simeon) was the given name of the apostle who would later be called Peter. Consider John 1:42,

“Jesus looked at him and said, ‘You are Simon the son of John. You shall be called Cephas’ which means Peter.”

Simon was his given name. But Jesus gave him a new name; Cephas. Cephas is Aramaic for ‘rock’. So where do we get the name Peter? That is the Greek form of ‘rock’. So Cephas and Peter are a bit like “Juan” being the Spanish form of “John”.

Simon and Simeon is the birth name given to Peter. Simon bar Jonah simply means that Simon was the son of John (or Jonah). Peter is the Greek form of the nickname given to Simon by Jesus. Cephas is the Aramaic form of the nickname given to Simon by Jesus.

So Simon, Simeon, and Simon bar-Jonah are all interchangeable. And Peter and Cephas are interchangeable. Clear as mud? There really isn’t much theological significance to the names and when they are used. It is significant that Jesus calls Peter “rock” and that his profession of faith is the rock on which the church is built. Some have also pointed out that Jesus frequently calls him Simon when the apostle does something boneheaded. That’ll preach but I’m not sure that this is the point the author is attempting to make.

Another interesting note is that John 1:42 is the only time that someone other than the apostle Paul refers to Peter by the Aramaic form ‘Cephas’. And Paul actually refers to him as Cephas every single time except for two times in Galatians 2 when he calls him Peter. So what of the one time that Paul calls him Peter? It’s likely that Paul is somewhat quoting the Jerusalem Council. Paul always referred to Peter by his Jewish name. I don’t this is a significant theological point, but it helps us to see its authenticity. It shows that Paul, the apostle to the non-Jews, was still thoroughly Jewish in his natural thought.

So there you have it. Peter really only has two names. Simon and Peter. But the multiple languages which the Bible is written in, causes a bit of confusion.

Photo source: here

**There are some who believe that Cephas and Peter are actually two separate people. Clement of Alexandria referred to a separate disciple of Jesus named Cephas. But this is almost certainly not the case. It’s likely a needless defense of the apostle. It would have been important during Clement’s time to not have two pillars (Peter and Paul) arguing with one another. The context of Galatians 2 would make little since if this is referring to one who isn’t the apostle Peter.