Preaching in Another Man’s Suit


I was embarrassed the moment I heard myself do it. I had listened to a Paul Washer sermon about 4 hours before I was going to preach to a group of teenagers. About half way through the sermon is when it happened….

I turned into Paul Washer.

I started using his unique phrasing. I started preaching the way that he preaches to drive home the sermon points. There wasn’t anything terribly wrong with it but I realized I was now someone that I had previously made fun of. I was now “that guy”.

That guy that tries to preach like Billy Graham. Or to preach with the tear in your voice like David Platt. Or to be a slow and methodical thinker like John Piper. Or to talk really fast and humorous and yet pointed like Matt Chandler.

Though we have more source material in the 21st century this is not a new phenomenon. Even in the 1700s there were preachers trying to be like other preachers. Students trying to be like the scholars who were teaching them. They were as Newton would often say, “trying to wear someone else’s armor”.

What Happened to Mark?

Yesterday, we looked at the fictional-but all too familiar—case of Mark. A young man who is passionate about the Lord but comes back to his old church as a terrible pain. What happened to Mark?

Newton would say that he was David trying to wear Saul’s armor:

Furnished with books and notions,
And arguments and pride
I practised all my motions,
And Satan’s pow’r defied
But soon perceived with trouble,
That these would do no good;
Iron to him is stubble,

And brass like rotten wood.
I triumphed at a distance
While he was out of sight;
But faint was my resistance
When forced to join in fight:
He broke my sword in shivers,
And pierced my boasted shield;
Laughed at my vain endeavors,
And drove me from the field.

(From Olney Hymn 28)

In his own experience Newton began the Christian life leaning too much upon other men. His celebrity of choice was revivalist George Whitefield. Some even mockingly called Newton “Little-Whitefield”.

Newton, a man who never had a formal education, was often disconcerted by the things he saw coming out of the Academy. Even remarking once to John Ryland, Jr. that he thought “the orthodoxy and life of the English Presbyterians received their death wound from academical studies” (Gordon, 351).

The problem, in Newton’s mind, was that young men like Mark were only getting notions in their head. As such they could only conquer Satan “from a distance”. As he would later say,

“If you lean upon books or men, or upon your own faculties and attainments, you will be in fear and in danger of falling continually.” (From Letter 2)

The Solution

The problem with young men like Mark is that they are trying to preach in another man’s suit. For Newton his solution was to preach Christ in your own suit. He provided two simple solutions to a student of divinity who wrote Newton enquiring about preaching.

First, this young man should diligently seek the Scriptures, prayer, and meditation through the power of the Holy Spirit. Rather than trying to preach like other people he ought to be himself, pursue the disciplines with vigor, and preach in full reliance upon Christ. Because, “if you lean upon books or men, or upon your own faculties and attainments, you will be in fear and in danger of falling continually” (Letter 2).

Secondly, let Christ always be your “capital subject”.

If you discuss some less essential topic, or bend all your strength to clear up some dark text, though you should display much learning and ingenuity, you will probably fall short of your main design, which I dare say will be to promote the glory of God, and the good of souls.

For Newton, the glory of God and the good of souls was the chief goal in preaching, anything else was likely pride and just notions in the head.

—

Do you agree with Newton’s view of the academy? How much do you believe his own lack of a formal education influenced his take on the academy? How did his lack of education hinder him? How might it have served him?

How would you counsel someone like Mark?

Is there anything else in your reading of Newton that you would like to share?

For Next Week:

Jan 23 Sermon on the Constraining Influence of the Love of Christ & Olney Hymn XLI
He-Man option: Wise Counsel 303-307, Letters p168-171 (Free as Letter 1 to Joshua Symonds here)

Today in Blogworld 01.16.15

The Bible is Not a Game of Telephone

Dan Wallace shows us why the Bible is not like the classic children’s game of telephone.

The Forest for the Trees: How to Cure Overwriting

Whenever I err in overwriting it is usually because I’m trying to sound more “writerly”.

God Is at Work in Your Unremarkable Days

This is such a sobering and encouraging reflection on all of the years in Genesis that we know nothing about.

John Calvin on Condoning Theological Delusion

I think people might be surprised that this thought comes from Calvin. Most people imagine him getting a sick joy out of burning witches, heretics, and anyone that disagreed with him.

I’m convinced that these guys are sober. And put on quite the show. (Also I can’t tell if there are curse words or if its German—I think its just German but put it on mute just in case):

Is This What Fancy Book-Learnin’ Does?

small__4501262081“What happened to Mark?” asks one of the bewildered purple-haired saints.

Two years ago Podunk Baptist Church sent a bright, energetic, and humble young man off to the seminary. This little gathering of believers has for over two-centuries housed some of the dearest saints. But Mark was different. Though young and a relatively new believer he stood out because of his marked brilliance, passion, and dedication.

Tears of joy mixed with sadness now watered the out-dated carpet, as Mark was sent off to learn how to be a pastor. Most of the members could still remember that cold September morning when a weird looking kid named Mark had “came forward” as an expression of his new found faith in Jesus. Within a short time these same folk—sitting in their same pews—had affirmed Mark’s call into the gospel ministry.

Seminary was the next logical step. The people at Podunk Baptist assumed that within a few short years they would be visiting Mark at the latest Gospel Conference. (That is if he could maybe spot the pastor and a few congregants some tickets).

Time went by and Podunk Baptist heard less and less of Mark. Finally, two long years later Mark accepts an invitation to come back to Podunk to preach a revival. The community is buzzing, in a way that only a small-town can buzz. Even people that darken the door of the church only on Santa’s birthday are considering coming to see if this kid’s fancy book learnin’ may have a remedy for their hurt.

The church rolls out the red-carpet. (Or rather the darkened mats they bought at Wal-Mart to cover the embarrassing rips created by Deacon Cary’s now infamous communion table moving incident.) These dear saints want to treat their shining star like he deserves. They are certain to be blessed and encouraged in their walk with the Lord. The ladies plan one of their famous pot-lucks. The men shave.

Anticipation causes the week since Mark’s acceptance of their invitation to feel almost as long as his two-year absence. If Mark was this smart, this passionate, and this dedicated two years ago what would he be like now that he has spent two years learning from the finest theologians in the world?

Finally the day arrives. Mark is running a little late, but that’s to be expected by such an important young man. He has little time to chat before the service. It’s go time.

Mark is introduced by the pastor; still the same guy that had shared the gospel with him years ago. After the glowing introduction the now-bearded Mark swags into the pulpit. It only takes a few sentences for Podunk Baptist to realize this is a different Mark than the one they sent away.

And it’s not good.

This revival will not be about the beauties and excellencies of Jesus. It will not be a passionate gospel exposition. This revival meeting will be five nights of Mark setting his old church straight. Each night he will put together a finely crafted sermon filled with three points addressing everything that the church erroneously taught him two years ago. Mark is in the “know” now.

What happened to Mark?

—

This article might seem a bit familiar to you. I posted this a couple years back under a different title to launch a series on Angry and Divisive Calvinists. But because it fits so well with what we will be discussing tomorrow concerning John Newton I thought I might repost it.

— photo credit: Wyoming_Jackrabbit via photopin cc

Today in Blogworld 01.15.15

A Different Kind of False Teacher

Aaron Armstrong helps us to see that there is a different kind of false teacher—and its one that might easily run rampant in Reformed Evangelical circles.

How to Write Good

Very helpful tips on writing by Tony Payne.

Why the Church Needs Intergenerational Friendships

We like to talk about the generational gap. We are thinking through these issues at our church. And I find Joseph Rhea’s conclusions here simple and helpful. “It sounds like a church organization problem. But the real problem, and the real solution, isn’t organizational—it’s personal. The real problem is that, increasingly, we’re no longer making friends across generational lines.”

What to Say to Church Members Leaving for Poor Reasons

Beneficial and practical.

See this is why cats are just terrible. They’re like the bully who takes your seat at lunch and refuses to give it back: