Is The Devil The Thief in John 10:10?

thief

“The thief comes only to steal and kill and destroy. I came that they may have life and have it abundantly.” –John 10:10

Ask 10 people who the thief in John 10:10 is and I bet you get at least nine of them telling you it is Satan. Pick up any modern devotional on this text and they will identify the thief as that treacherous arch-enemy of the faith, Satan. But is that really what the text says?

I watched a documentary awhile back on a master pick-pocket. You know how he did it? He focused all of your attention on one hand or object whilst using the other hand to rob you blind. I wonder if Satan might be doing the same thing with our text in John 10:10. He’s getting all the attention meanwhile he’s using his free hand to rob us blind.

What is that free hand? Consider the context of John 10:10. Jesus has just healed a man blind from birth. And what was the Pharisees response to this? They treated the guy terribly. Rather than celebrate the work of God in his life they cast him out of their presence because he testified of the work of Jesus in his life. As chapter 9 closes, Jesus says it was “for judgment I came into this world, that those who do not see may see, and those who see may become blind.” The calloused and arrogant Pharisees mocked this saying. John 10 is a response to them. There is no break in the action it’s a direct response to them.

Ezekiel 34 is the background to John 10. In Ezekiel 34 the religious leaders of the day were like shepherds getting fat on sheep. John 10 serves as a contrast between Jesus and the Ezekiel 34-like Pharisees. His first parable has a direction connection to John 9. That blind man was one of His sheep and Jesus brought him into the fold. The Pharisees, however, shut him out instead of bringing him in. They weren’t faithful gatekeepers.

The second parable, where John 10:10 is found, is a contrast between those who bring death and those who bring life. The third is similar in that the shepherd lays down his life for the sheep, while the hired hand bolts as soon as the sheep are no longer of benefit to him. So clearly the thief that John has in mind is not specifically Satan. There has been no mention of Satan as the thief in these parable. His points are directed at the religious leaders of the day.

And this is why our interpretation of the passage matters. We’re so busy looking for the work of Satan to kill and destroy that we play right into the hands of false teachers who merely peddle the word. When I was first a believer, and being ‘discipled’ by the prosperity peddlers at TBN, this was one of the favorite verses used. They likened poverty, sickness, and such as the work of the enemy. They were the ones, though, who would through Jesus give their hearers abundant life. All you had to do was plant your seeds of faith. Fatten up the shepherd and he’ll be sure to bless you.

Undoubtedly, Satan is the arch-thief. I’ll happily admit that. John 8 helps us see these false teachers are only doing what their father the devil has taught them to do. But what he is doing is drawing our attention to himself while using his false teachers to rob us blind.

Poverty stricken people focus on Satan as the great destroyer of their lives while cutting checks to the Benny Hinn’s and John Hagee’s of the world. Listen to these words of Hagee:

God Almighty controls the economy of America, and God controls your income! Your source is God, not the United States government.  … When you give to God, He controls your income. There is no such thing as fixed income in the Kingdom of God. Your income is controlled by your giving.”

Or again:

The difference between living a life of prosperity and a life of poverty is a matter of choice.  … Tithing is a choice. If you choose to not tithe, you will be living under a financial curse.”

Those tithes certainly go towards funding Hagee’s $300,000 salary. If you want abundant life then give to the under-shepherd and the Chief Shepherd will surely bless you. Friends, this is the exact opposite of what Jesus spoke of the good shepherd in John 10. He lays down His life for us because that is who He is. That is what a shepherd does. He doesn’t lay down His life in response to our giving. He doesn’t bless because of us. He tenderly cares for us because He is good.

Yes, Satan kills and destroys. And uses false teachers of all stripes to do it. Those who distract from the gospel. Those who shut out the kingdom to the broken and battered. Those who have a ministry of taking instead of giving. Those who are about personal prosperity and comfort and safety instead of gospel advancement. These are the thieves. These are the robbers of our day. And they parade around with words of being blessed by God.

If you want to find those following the Jesus way. Look to the back of the line. There you will find those “like men sentenced to death”. Those who are “the spectacle to the world, to angels, and to men”.  Those who are labeled as “fools for Christ’s sake” and as “weak” and nothing much better than the refuse of the world. Gum on the shoe. And that’s what Jesus meant by the abundant life. Word peddlers would have us robbed of this joy, to sell our birthright for a pot of stew called the American dream. 

Photo source: here

Why Racial Reconciliation Requires More Than Gospel Proclamation

Racism is a sin.

The only cure for sin is the gospel.

Therefore, the only cure for racism is the gospel.

So, racial unity only come through gospel proclamation.

This seems like flawless logic. However, I don’t believe it is a right understanding of the gospel. If we are talking ultimates or foundations then I agree wholeheartedly. Ultimately the only cure for the complete obliteration of racism is a changed and regenerate heart which only comes through the finished work of Jesus. And the gospel grows in our hearts as it is consistently proclaimed.

The problem, however, is with that fourth step and the word only. I’m one of the guys who is consistently proclaiming the sufficiency of Christ and His Word. I’ve been known to even annoy people by my insistence that the gospel is sufficient and therefore we ought to camp out there and put all of our eggs in the gospel basket. So, to say that the above logic is a bit flawed causes me to bristle a bit at first. It sounds like I’m saying the gospel is insufficient. That if racial reconciliation is to happen then it needs something more than the gospel.

But the gospel is more than proclamation. This isn’t about gospel sufficiency it’s about preserving the gospel from being a book of magical incantations which work ex opere operato (from the work worked). Things are not magically healed just because we speak gospel at them. I appreciate these words by Mark Jones:

Not infrequently will one hear that we should just ‘preach the gospel’ and then let the Spirit do his work in believers. Of course this statement can be taken in a number of ways that even the staunchest opponent of antinomianism could agree to. But often there is such an overreaction to ‘moralizing sermons’ that preachers fail to give appropriate, soul-searching application in the form of commands. Direct and specific application is something that Paul does not omit in his letters. For example, he reminds the Thessalonians to love one another and then urges them ‘to do this more and more’ (1 Thess. 4:10). Try harder? Yes. Do more? Yes. For Paul the law functioned as a means of sanctification. (Jones, Antinomianism, 38)

Allow me to illustrate this. Say that you’ve got a husband who abuses his wife. Would your answer really be, “All we can really do is keep preaching the gospel to him, only that will change his heart”? Or are you going to do things as you are proclaiming the gospel. One of the first things you are going to do is protect the wife, involve the authorities as necessary, and work towards reconciliation and redemption. Hopefully, you aren’t going to just preach gospel and assume you’ve fixed the whole thing.

Yet that seems to be our solution when it comes to racial reconciliation. I’m certain some will point out that my analogy isn’t perfectly fitting. Much of the talk in our day about racial reconciliation is about righting wrongs which were done in the past and improving upon structures and systems which still have vestiges of racism.

So one might say a better analogy would be a husband who has never laid a hand on his wife, but he is still impacted by his upbringing. His father was abusive to his mother. His grandfather and his grandfather’s father were also abusive. This created a pattern and a culture in which women were objectified. Even though our present day husband doesn’t physically abuse his wife he still has a pattern about him which tends to objectify and demean his wife. How do we know this? His wife will tell you. She feels ridiculed, demeaned, and emotionally battered by her husband. Yes, he is a million times better than his own father. She thanks God for that. But he’s still not the man he ought to be.

How would you then counsel this man? Would your counsel towards him change if he came into your office with a posture of, “I’m not sure what she wants out of me”? Wouldn’t that attitude be exhibit A of the wife’s plea that her husband tends to treat her as an object and not a person? I’m certain you would rightly proclaim the gospel to this husband. But would you leave it there? Hopefully, not. You would put together a plan to not only proclaim the gospel but also to rightly apply the gospel. This would include real practical steps to being a better husband to his wife. Wouldn’t you also consult the wife? Wouldn’t it matter how she viewed reconciliation?

I’m sure this analogy breaks down on several fronts, but I believe it gets at my main point; namely, racism is ultimately cured by the gospel but that doesn’t mean racial reconciliation only requires gospel proclamation. It needs what Kevin DeYoung calls Spirit-powered, gospel-driven, faith-fueled effort. (See Hole in Our Holiness).

Photo source: here

Read This! 04.26.18

Wanted: People to Lead Us in the Way of Wonder

This was inspiring to me.

How Are You Reshaping God Based on Your Fears?

That is a really thought-provoking question.

Can We Skip the Parts of the NT Not in the Original Manuscripts?

Not only is this a helpful answer to the question but also a good way to think through textual variants.

On Getting Churches Totally Wrong

Amen.

10 Things Teachers Did Not Have To Deal With 10 Years Ago

I hate that teachers have to deal with so much of this. Really wish we’d take a long hard look at the underlying philosophies behind all this.

What is the Biggest Problem Facing Evangelicalism?

Hard to argue with.

Don’t Celebrate Brokenness

Yes. This needs to be said. Welcome brokenness but expect transformation is what I say.

4 Reasons Why Pastoral Honeymoons are Shrinking

What are those? LOL.

This, on animals playing dead, was fascinating to watch:

10 Videos That Never Fail to Make Me Laugh

On occasion I’ll have friends over and get sucked into the never-ending YouTube vortex. You know the one I mean. The one where it starts innocently enough by saying, “Hey have you seen this video…” Six hours later you’ve watched about every decent YouTube clip known to man. Here are 10 of my favorite YouTube clips.

I love news bloopers. This is one of my favorites:

Okay. Early 90’s wrestling. Pointless screaming at one another. And then the epic debut of The Shockmaster:

You could waste a couple hours watching QVC and HSN bloopers. This is one of the better ones:

It doesn’t get much better than Skeletor:

You could spend days watching cat videos. My favorite are cat fail videos. It’s hard to beat Kitty Corliss:

Goats. Making fun of Oprah. What a great combination:

This is one of those videos that really shouldn’t be all that funny, but it’s hilarious:

There is something about people jumping and coming up short that gets me every time, this one is epic:

Somebody got fired over this one:

This is a perfect parody of everything wrong in youth ministry:

I have to include some Rhett and Link. None better than their Rabbit Lightning:

So many more videos I could post. What are some of your favorite?