Read This! 05.10.18

The Preacher and Politics: Seven Thoughts

Appreciate these thoughts by Kevin DeYoung.

The Danger of an Unscraped Knee

This is something we are trying to do more and more of with our children.

I Discipled a Murderer

What to do when people don’t change.

Thinking Wrongly About Leadership

I found these points helpful.

The Greatest Threat Facing the YRR Resurgence

Yep, I’m seeing every one of these.

Principles and Guidelines for Separation

I preached on 2 Corinthians 6:14-7:1 last week and found this helpful.

Three Types of People Who Hinder the Church

That first one is super deadly.

What Pope Francis Should Have Said

Pope Francis, to be completely honest and historical, gave a heretical response to a young man about his father. Jordan Standridge shares what he should have said.

Here is why tumbleweeds tumble…and now I can’t get an old VBS song out of my head:

One Thing Seminary Didn’t Teach Me: Pastoring and Pop Theology

“My Bible is in English!”

That’s when I knew I was not going to win the argument. I was fresh out of Bible college and armed with a Zodhiates education in Greek. I’d just preached one of my first sermons and it was on the Christmas story. Apparently some of my comments had blown up an elderly couples vision of the birth of our Lord. My suggestion that Jesus was likely born in something a bit like a ditch in a cave was appalling to them.

When they confronted me the next Sunday I very calmly attempted to give a bit of a history lesson on the ancient nativity scene. They were unmoved and armed with their Baptist hymnal. “Why does it say Away In A Manger?!?!?!!” I dug in a little deeper and then out of deep insecurity attempted to put them in their place with my knowledge of Greek. I’m not even sure how I thought that would help win the argument. But I did, and rightly so, wanted them to see we should get our theology and such from the Bible. And that’s when they informed me that their Bible was in English and not Greek. I knew at that point that I didn’t stand a chance to win the argument.

So I politely said we would just have to agree to disagree. I tried pointing to what we had in common and point them back to Jesus. Then I took my seat a few rows in front of them only to be absolutely mortified that our music ministers song choice that morning was Away In A Manger.

I share this story because it is a decent representation of a large percentage of the interactions that I’ve had in my almost two decades of doing ministry. And yet it is not reflective of any of the discussions I had in classes in seminary. Granted, I’m still a couple classes short of my M.Div. So it’s possible we’ll have a class on pastoring in pop theology. But I doubt it.

What we argued about most in seminary were the intellectual debates of the day. I’m still waiting to be able to use my twenty page paper on John Calvin’s use of ilasmos in 1 John 2:2. Most of the things which were big deals and arguments in seminary are questions which are not even on the radar of people in the pew. And truthfully there is no way that a seminary could possibly train a pastor for all of the questions you’ll get as a pastor.

Now don’t get me wrong. I have gotten great value in almost every one of the classes I took in seminary. And even though teaching a class on The New Perspective on Paul is way off our radar, knowing all of that stuff has been beneficial. It’s beneficial to learn how to argue and how to make a sustained defense of a biblical position. The exercise of writing papers and dealing with divergent view points has trained me for dealing with pop theology. So seminary helped build a great foundation. But there is one thing lacking, I believe.

The One Thing Lacking

That one thing lacking is training in how to discuss the Bible when the foundation is pop theology and not biblical theology. You see the biggest difference between what we do in seminary and what you do in the local church is in the way we go about discussing our viewpoints. In seminary there are rules of engagement. There is a certain format you must adhere to in writing an academic paper. You tend to come from a similar base of knowledge. Throw every bit of that out the window when engaging with folks in the local church. To 99% of your congregation G.K. Beale would be identified as a clothing line instead of a theologian.

I hope none of this sounds as if I’m saying folks within the local church are dolts. We’ve got many dear saints in our church who could shame me in their knowledge of things like Old Testament history. They’ve been going at this following Jesus thing longer than I’ve even been alive. So, I’m no intending to be dismissive of the way in which most within your local church live out their faith. I’m simply trying to say that the way you discuss things in seminary will never happen in a local church. You just aren’t starting from the same place. And it takes a good bit of time to adjust to that. And it’s why some young men just coming out of seminary get eaten up in the local church. They cannot adjust to the way we engage folks in the local church.

A Few Tips

Here are a couple things I’ve learned about engaging folks who had a pop theology with a robust biblical theology:

1. Trust that God’s people really do love God’s Word. If you come into a church with an ‘me’ vs. ‘them’ mentality you’re not going to be as helpful as you could be. God’s Spirit lives within these dear saints. Many have embraced pop theology because it’s all they’ve been offered. Some turn on TBN 24/7 because they are hungry for more of Jesus. Have confidence, then, that people will embrace biblical theology.

2. Don’t too easily dismiss the pop theology. Pop theology often has much truth in it. And it’s been these kernels of truth which have sustained these saints for years. I truly believe a weak faith can lay hold of a strong Christ. As Richard Sibbes so eloquently illustrated, it’s foolish to kill a fly on the forehead with a mallet. In as much as you can build from pop theology, don’t burn the whole thing to the ground and try to start over.

3. Nobody cares about your big words and mastery of the Greek. One of my Greek professors said it well, “Greek is like your underpants. It’s there for the support but should never be worn on the outside”. We harm our people by unnecessarily using big words or foreign languages. Give the fruit, spare the sweat of your exegetical labor. It’s a mark of immaturity to try to use your education to win an argument. If you want people to be entrenched in pop theology then a surefire way to do that is to talk like good solid biblical theology is only for the elite.

4. Don’t underestimate consistent, faithful, long-term Bible teaching. Patient, loving, and relevant biblical exposition will do much to root out all that’s wrong in pop theology and replace it with good biblical theology. Expository preaching not only helps people on a weekly basis through what is proclaimed in the Word of God, it also models for our people the way to engage with the Bible. Modeling faithful exegesis will do much in rooting out pop theology. Just keep patiently proclaiming Jesus. The Spirit will use it.

Photo source: here

Read This! 05.08.18

Bring the Books!

This is Jared Wilson’s defense of more books. I agree.

Confidence Comes from a Clearer View of God

This is good.

The Problem of Superstitious Christianity

I’ve got a whole series in the works on this topic. I appreciate the work here.

The Trinity Debate

I kind of missed this one, so this is helpful.

Six Reasons to Read Fiction

I’m trying to read more fiction.

Leaders, Talk About Power to Protect the Vulnerable

A heart-wrenching and helpful story from Chris Davis.

10 Things You Should Know About Being Reconciled to God

Just preached on reconciliation a couple weeks ago.

Wives “Submit” or “Respect”?

Bill Mounce tackles the Greek text on this one.

Can a true Christian have depression?

How My Views On The Pastoral Response to Spousal Abuse have Developed

There has been quite the conversation on Twitter in regards to a story SWBTS president Paige Patterson told back in 2000. There is much more to the story than this, but some of it is that Patterson had counseled a young woman to remain in an abusive relationship and not pursue a divorce from her husband. There was no mention, really, of calling the authorities or of separation. I would also say that I don’t think Patterson intended to give an exhaustive answer nor do I really care to discuss all the hullabaloo surrounding Patterson. Instead I’d like to share how my views on this have changed over the years.

I will begin by saying that early on in my ministry I would have given advice very similar to that of Paige Patterson. There are two main reasons for this. First, I had a bit of a Messiah complex. I wanted to fix problems and people. And I certainly did not want to outsource a spiritual issue to the police. Secondly, I had heard several stories, similar to the one Patterson shared, of God using a wife’s humble submission to win over her husband. I wanted to see redemption and reconciliation happen. And I suppose I had read those stories into 1 Peter 3:1.

But here is what I wasn’t considering. It’s not my call. I don’t have the authority to direct someone else’s martyrdom. If criminal activity has taken place then it is my job as a pastor to report this. My calling, first and foremost, is to protect the abused person. Stories of reconciliation and redemption are not contrary to responsibly protecting victims.

I’m still not convinced that divorce is something you must counsel. But I’m also not convinced that it isn’t appropriate. Where I’ve changed my view on this is that I no longer believe it’s under the purview of my call as a pastor. There are things in this situation which would be my job and some thing which wouldn’t.

A Few Presuppositions

It’s important that you know a couple of the presuppositions I have. First, I believe it is permissible for a wife to stay. I also believe it is permissible to leave. If a husband has abused his wife he has broken covenant with her. (I realize that point is debatable, hence me admitting my presuppositions). Because the husband is the one who has already broken covenant she is not under obligation to continue in the marriage. No matter the depth of the sin against us it is never permissible for us to respond in sin, but that is not the issue here.

John Bunyan struggled with this as he faced persecution and came to the conclusion that flying and standing are both biblically warranted.

He that flies, has warrant to do so; he that stands, has warrant to do so. Yea, the same man may both fly and stand, as the call and working of God with his heart may be. Moses fled, Ex. 2:15; Moses stood, Heb. 11:27. David fled, 1 Sam. 19:12; David stood, 24:8. Jeremiah fled, Jer. 37:11­–12; Jeremiah stood, 38:17. Christ withdrew himself, Luke 19:10; Christ stood, John 18:1–8. Paul fled, 2 Cor. 11:33; Paul stood, Acts 20:22–23. . . .

Do not fly out of a slavish fear, but rather because flying is an ordinance of God, opening a door for the escape of some, which door is opened by God’s providence, and the escape countenanced by God’s Word, Matt. 10:23.

Secondly, I believe the gospel really is powerful. I believe repentance, redemption, and reconciliation really can happen. I also understand the cycle of abuse and how easily it is for an abuser to use the hope of redemption as a further excuse to abuse. Yet, even so we must not neuter the gospel and its power simply because ungodly people may abuse it. Therefore, I will always lean towards leaving a door open to reconciliation and seeing the gospel work. Gospel hope is my default posture (or at least I want this to be true).

How My Views Have Matured

However, that is not my decision to make. And this is where my views, I believe, have matured over the years. I’ve come to understand that it is my job to exercise the authority given to me in helping the church to pursue biblical avenues like church discipline to bring about repentance. But that does not mean a wife is wrong to allow a husband to bear the full weight of the consequences of his sin against her. I can encourage her to leave the door open for reconciliation but I must present this in such a way that one is not seen as dishonoring Christ if fleeing is what the conscience and Spirit allow.

Abuse is heinous but it is not the unforgivable sin. An abuser needs the gospel. Deeply. This doesn’t mean they need to be given full access or a free reign to continue abuse. But we must not pretend that an abuser is a lost cause. We must pursue repentance and healing and restoration through Christ. This must happen in the context of continually protecting the wife.

So my views on a pastoral response to those being physically abused by a spouse has matured over the years. I’ve not moved one bit towards accepting or giving a free pass on unbiblical divorce. But I have, through experience and study, come to acknowledge my counsel in the past would have overstepped my calling. Thankfully, the Lord did not give me situations where this was much more than theoretical. He preserved others from hearing unhelpful counsel from me.

I also would say I know my heart through every step of this maturing. I would have never wanted to see a woman abused. I was not coming from this out of a position of misogyny. It was a position of ignorance fueled by a deep gospel hope. I wanted to see redemption happen. And I wanted to see redemption happen so bad that I would have given poor counsel and overstepped my pastoral authority.

Photo source: here

A really good article which outlines the position I would hold is this: A Pastoral Response to Physical Abuse in the Family.