Review of 40 Questions About Interpreting the Bible

“My Bible is in English”, said my infuriated listener. 

The week prior I had preached one of my first sermons; it was on the birth of Jesus, and in this sermon I had mentioned that our typical manger scene is probably not quite accurate.  I had, apparently, ruined this dear ladies image of Christmas.  The pastor informed me that I had “stirred up a hornet’s nest”. 

In my youthful vigor and ignorance I assumed that I could simply explain to her the context of the passage, the Greek terms (which I didn’t know well myself), and a few historical facts and she would understand and not want to punch me in the kidney. 

I quickly discovered that I had indeed entered into a hornet’s nest.  She did not want a lesson on biblical interpretation.  She wanted to know why this young whippersnapper was blowing up her Christmas. 

In all honesty her methods of biblical interpretation was atrocious.  My pride was worse.  I would have done everything a million times different now.  I would have been less concerned with showing off my fancy book learnin’ and more concerned about loving her and gently teaching biblical truth. 

She didn’t want a hermeneutics lesson.  She needed one.  (And so do I).  But she didn’t want one.   In fact one of the great needs in the church today is a better understanding of hermeneutics. 

Unfortunately, many believe that hermeneutics is something you catch on a mission trip to a third world country.  That is because many of those that teach hermeneutics often insist on using technical terms that relates more to academia than those cracking open their Bible’s within the church.  As a result sound hermeneutics are often relegated to the halls of academia and the average lay-person is left to sift through his Bible on his own.  This only widens the gap between “preacher” and “pew”. 

Summary

Hermeneutics (biblical interpretation) should be accessible to everyone.  This is what motivates Dr. Robert Plummer’s latest book 40 Questions on Biblical Interpretation.  As Plummer states in the introduction, “my goal [is] to be accessible without being simplistic and scholarly without being pedantic”. 

Through these 40 questions Plummer discusses issues of canon and criticism, as well as issues of interpretation and meaning.  About sixty percent of the book is given to interpreting various literary genres: parables, prophecy, letters, poetry, etc,.  The final five questions provide a brief interaction with interpretive issues in recent discussion. 

Each question is given about 6-10 pages for a brief yet thorough answer.  At the end of each chapter the reader will find helpful reflection questions and also a few books and resources for further study.  The reader, then, is not left with only six pages but also questions to provoke thought and helpful resources to assist with continued study of the topic at hand. 

Analysis

I have had Dr. Plummer for three classes now and I have enjoyed everyone of them.  Few professors could make at 8:00am Greek class exciting—Dr. Plummer does.  His obvious passion for Jesus and desire for edifying the church bleeds through in these pages.  Occasionally the reader will even catch glimpses of Plummer’s humor and wit.  (Who else has a New Testament professor that quotes Spinal Tap?) 

In the past when people have asked me for a book on helping them study the Bible better I have scrambled to find one.  I know there are really solid books on hermeneutics but they are typically so bogged down with technical language and scholarly discussion that they remain unhelpful to the person not familiar with the jargon and ongoing debates within academia.  Then there are also those books that are written on a popular level but really do not provide as solid of help in biblical interpretation.  Now that Dr. Plummer has written this book I know of at least one resource that I can hand them. 

He deals with many of the questions that people in the pew are asking; but he does not stop there, he also deals with questions students will face.  Plummer manages to deal with both types of questions in such a way as to be both satisfying and accessible. 

If you have questions about biblical interpretation, or you want to hone your skills in interpreting God’s Word, you will find this book helpful.  For twelve bucks you cannot find a better resource.  Furthermore, Dr. Plummer is making many resources available for free on his website: here.  This book would be ideal for a small group, Sunday school class, or even a resource to assist your children in learning sound bible study methods (especially with these free resources). 

As a pastor I recently taught a series on biblical interpretation on Sunday evenings.  I found myself time and time again going back to Dr. Plummer’s work.  You will use this book as a great reference.  Add it to your library. 

A Somewhat Quick Review of Early Christian Thinkers, Edited by Paul Foster

“Why can’t we all just get along?  We should go back to the simplicity of the Early Church era before Constantine screwed everything up and when everybody was on basically the same page.” 

“Not so fast”, says Paul Foster. 

Foster, the editor of Early Christian Thinkers, has compiled a helpful primer on twelve characters from the early church.  They are what Foster calls a “motley crew” (although I must have skipped the chapter on Tommy Lee and Nikki Sixx).  Speaking of this motley crew, he notes:

It is highly debatable whether they would have felt comfortable in each other’s company.  Yet in many way that is what makes this selection of early Christian figures so fascinating, because in a very real sense their diversity represents much of the complex dynamic of early Christianity from the mid second century to the beginning of the fourth century.  In no way can early church history be represented as irenic and unproblematic.  (xix)

“Who is this motley crew”, you ask? 

There is a single chapter by a different author on these twelve early Christian thinkers: Justin Martyr, Tatian, Irenaeus, Theophilus of Antioch, Clement of Alexandria, Tertullian, Perpetua, Origen, Cyrpian of Carthage, Hippolytus of Rome, Gregory Thaumaturgus, and Eusebius of Caesarea. 

If after reading that list you are shaking your head and wondering, “who”,   that’s what makes this book so helpful and appealing.  Even for a history nerd like myself there was plenty information, stories, and thoughts in here to keep me intrigued. 

Even the interaction with the more notable of these figures is still helpful.  As an example, Paul Parvis’ chapter on Justin Martyr is an outstanding treatment of Martyr in his historical context.  Parvis helps the reader to really get an accurate feel for Justin’s influence and give a contemporary model for one that “was trying to explain the Gospel he had received in terms that would be comprehensible to the world around him” (9).  Knowing this helps us to come to a better understanding of the intention behind much of Martyr’s writing, while simultaneously spurring the reader on to similar incarnational missions.  

Brief Analysis

As you can expect in a volume written by twelve different authors some chapters are better written than others.  Some chapters keep you engaged, on the edge of your seat, and searching Amazon for other resources on the Christian thinker being discussed.  Other chapters feel a little like reading a 5th grade history book; somewhat stale but still helpful. 

I am not certain that this would serve well as an introduction to the Early Church Fathers (for that I would suggest Haykin’s latest work: Rediscovering the Church Fathers).  However, it is not so technical and filled with jargon that the average lay-person could not sift through it and learn a good deal about church history.  It’s best audience will probably be for those with a previous knowledge of history and those who are perpetual students of history. 

If you want to know more about the thinking in the early church through the lens of several key figures then this book is definitely worth looking into.  I may also mention that it is rare to find a book with this much historical quality being sold for under $15.  It’s a steal, especially if you get it for 10 bucks on your Kindle. 

—

**I got this book free from IVP in exchange for a review.  You’ll have to buy it, which you can do so here.  I didn’t have to give a positive review, but I did anyways because I like it. 

A Loser’s Guide to 2011 NFL Predictions

AFC EAST

  1. New England Patriots
  2. New York Jets
  3. Buffalo Bills
  4. Miami Dolphins

AFC NORTH

  1. Baltimore Ravens
  2. Pukesburg Steelers
  3. Cleveland Browns
  4. Cincinnati Bengals

AFC SOUTH

  1. Houston Texans
  2. Indianapolis Colts
  3. Tennessee Titans
  4. Jacksonville Jaguars

AFC WEST

  1. Kansas City Chiefs
  2. San Diego Chargers
  3. Oakland Raiders
  4. Denver Broncos

NFC EAST

  1. Philadelphia Eagles
  2. Dallas Cowboys
  3. Washington Redskins
  4. New York Giants

NFC NORTH

  1. Green Bay Packers
  2. Detroit Lions
  3. Minnesota Vikings
  4. Chicago Bears

NFC SOUTH

  1. Atlanta Falcons
  2. New Orleans Saints
  3. Tampa Bay Buccaneers
  4. Carolina Panthers

NFC WEST

  1. St. Louis Rams
  2. Arizona Cardinals
  3. San Francisco 49ers
  4. Seattle Seahawks

AFC WILDCARDS: New York Jets, Pittsburgh Steelers

NFC WILDCARDS: Detroit Lions, New Orleans Saints

AFC TITLE GAME: Baltimore Ravens vs. New York Jets

NFC TITLE GAME: Atlanta Falcons vs. Philadelphia Eagles

SUPER BOWL: Atlanta Falcons defeat the Baltimore Ravens

MVP: Matt Ryan

Comeback Player of the Year: Matthew Stafford

Rookie of the Year:  AFC—AJ Green   NFC—Julio Jones

Borrowed Light FFL Champion: Tripp’s Lip Tent

Growth or Removal?

In 1786 a relatively newly married John Ryland, Jr. found himself in financial difficulty, mostly due to trying to cover for his fathers bad financial decisions.  To this Newton wrote a letter which included this line:

“He will either diminish the burden, when too heavy or increase our strength to support it, which amounts to the same thing”. 

If you had your choice, “increase in strength to support it” or a “diminished burden”, which would you choose? 

I want to say that I would choose growth, but my heart tells me that I probably rather long for removal of difficulty instead.