Read This! 03.14.19

10 Ways to Lead a Great Team Meeting

There are few things more soul-sucking than being in a pointless meeting. Following this tips will save you and others from that experience.

All the Lonely People

Connected. And lonely.

Twelve Rules for the Bookish Life

I appreciate this.

Satan Isn’t After the SBC, God Is

Amen!!!

Gospel-Parenting for First Generation Parents

It’s tough if you weren’t raised in a particularly Christian home to know how to disciple your kids well.

The Most Underrated Mission Field in America

I also think it’s the hardest to witness to.

Biblical Principles for Ethnic Harmony

I really wish we could rally around simple things like this and stop taking shots at one another.

When You Make Your Bed in Hell

What a powerful testimony of the relentless love of God.

I’m told I should be very excited about this OBJ trade, but I’m reserved:

What if Paul’s Thorn in the Flesh Was This?

“… Therefore, in order to keep me from becoming conceited, I was given a thorn in my flesh, a messenger of Satan, to torment me.” (2 Corinthians 12:7, NIV)

There has been much speculation on what Paul’s “thorn in the flesh” was. Some have speculated that it was a chronic medical condition, a human adversary, or some sort of temptation to sin. The speculation is wide ranging, and likely will always be so. Not knowing exactly what it is can actually be helpful to us – Paul’s point here is that God used something undesirable to keep Paul from sinning by becoming prideful. But I want to add one possibility to the speculation that I’ve not heard suggested as of yet.

Two things are worth noting in Paul’s discussion of this “thorn in the flesh”. First, is the fact that it is, literally, an “angel of Satan”. Whether this is a demon, an evil angel (as angels most often have a physical form in Scripture, whereas demons do not), a physical manifestation of Satan himself, or a human agent on Satan’s behalf, is unclear. But if it were one of the first two options, it is likely that we can rule out temptation.  In Scripture, we see evil spirits entering people in the Old Testament, and demons entering people in the New Testament. But one thing is interesting about their work – they seldom (if ever) directly entice people to sin.

When we watch Saul with an evil spirit (1 Samuel 16), it doesn’t appear that it is enticing Saul to sin. It’s said that it is “tormenting” Saul. Though Saul sins during these times, trying to kill David, it is likely more of an effect of the mental or physical affliction that he is suffering. Most people don’t try to hurt someone else when they are feeling well and in good mental health. We see this throughout the New Testament as well. Those who are afflicted by demons, are most often in some sort of mental or physical distress.

Demons cause people to be unable to speak (Matt. 9:33), unable to hear (Matt. 12:22), have seizures (Matt. 17:14), and cause physical issues such as back problems (Luke 13:11). Their most often seen actions, are those which afflict people with amoral ailments. These obviously have effects on the actions of those afflicted, but aren’t necessarily direct enticement to sin.

The second thing we should note is the purpose for Paul’s thorn – “to keep [Paul] from becoming conceited…”. We see a similar idea in Job 33:12-18:

“But I tell you, in this you are not right,

for God is greater than any mortal.

13 Why do you complain to him

that he responds to no one’s words?

14 For God does speak—now one way, now another—

though no one perceives it.

15 In a dream, in a vision of the night,

when deep sleep falls on people

as they slumber in their beds,

16 he may speak in their ears

and terrify them with warnings,

17 to turn them from wrongdoing

and keep them from pride,

18 to preserve them from the pit,

their lives from perishing by the sword.

This is spoken by Elihu, an observer of Job and his friends. Elihu is the only individual in the book of Job who is not rebuked for his speech. But Elihu seems to be offering the option that God speaks to individuals through nightmares, in order to keep them from sin. One sin Elihu names specifically in v. 17 is pride. Paul tells us that this happened to him in order to keep him from becoming conceited, which is language that is similar to what Elihu describes. Elihu says that God may “terrify them with warning, to turn them from wrongdoing and keep them from pride…”, Paul says that God sent an “angel of Satan” to “torment” him, in order that he may not “become conceited”.

Furthermore, considering the fact that Paul’s “thorn” was given to him because of the visions he was having, it would also make sense if Paul’s “thorn” were something comparable in nature to that which would have inevitably caused his pride. Dreams are also recognized to be caused by the body, though most often used by God upon their remembrance, which would fit Paul’s classification of this “thorn” as “in the flesh”.

Though we may never know what Paul’s “thorn in the flesh” was, this seems to be a reasonable explanation for it, since it would find similarity with the work of evil spirits, is comparable to the cause of his pride, and is specifically taught to be a means used by God to ward off pride in the Old testament.

But the debate continues!

Photo source: here

Read This! 03.12.19

5 Rules to Help You Fail Less Often with Social Media

These are helpful rules. I need to be better about that first one.

5 Conversations to Have With Students Before They Leave Your Church

Identity in Christ is foundational. If they get that, I’m confident the other things will eventually fall into place where they need to be.

Two Delusions That Can Threaten Any Church

So good. “The pastor is the church’s servant, but the church is never the pastor’s master.”

I Never Expected to Doubt

This is a powerful story.

God Awakens Us in the Wilderness

This has also been my experience.

10 Things You Should Know About Paul’s Letter to Laodicea

I love the way Sam Storms thinks through this issue.

The Sheer Difficulty of Reconciliation

I so appreciate the honesty of this post.

Are You Persuading or Are You Polarizing?

Such a vital question to ask.

Our family was blown away by this audition on American Idol. (Not too crazy about the lyrics on the piano…but this dude can play):

Are Their Burn Marks Our Fault?

Can a man carry fire next to his chest and his clothes not be burned? –Proverbs 6:27

I’ve always found it interesting that Solomon wrote that line. Solomon apparently thought he was an exception to the rule. He carried fire next to his chest and it caused his whole kingdom to crumble. I considered this question awhile back, when I asked how old Solomon was when he wrote Proverbs. I still hold this position:

Yet I am increasingly convinced that Solomon was actually younger or middle aged when he wrote Proverbs 5-7. Given Solomon demise later in life this is absolutely shocking and serves as fitting warning to us. What all of this means is that Solomon—much like many of us—thought he was an exception to the rules. He knew full well that he was holding fire to his chest, but he thought he wouldn’t have gotten burned.

Bruce Waltke makes the point well: 

“If one should ask, ‘If Solomon is the wise author, how could he have died such a fool?’ let it be noted that he constructed his own gibbet on which he impaled himself—that is, he ceased listening to his own instruction. Spiritual success today does not guarantee spiritual success tomorrow”.

The point I’m making today isn’t about Solomon and our own need to obey the Scriptures. Rather I want to think about this in the context of parenting. I fear that our media habits might be holding fire to the chest of our children. And I also think our generation is just arrogant enough to think they’ll not get burned by it.

In his excellent and eye-opening book, The Purity Principle, author Randy Alcorn compares consumption of suggestive media to taking a little bit of arsenic. We wouldn’t even think of having our children peering through a window to watch the newly-wed neighbors making out in a car. We’d shut the curtains and shield them from such a thing. It’s a fire we recognize would burn them. But why do we suddenly think because it’s mediated between a television screen instead of a window that they will not be burned?

It’s not my goal to give any sort of hard and fast rules that I think you ought to abide by. I don’t think the issue here is a ratings system. It’s just a simple question. Are we setting our children up for failure? Are we teaching them how to play with fire and expecting they won’t get burned?

Photo source: here