Today in Blogworld 11.26.13

10 Times It’s Wise to Hold Your Tongue

Here are ten times that it is better to refrain from talking. (I’d imagine typing, would apply as well). (HT: Challies)

Should the Church ‘Get Out of the Marriage Business’?

It’s sad that we even have to consider this.

Free Saeed

Do this.

How to Deal with Holiday Family Tensions

This is an older article, but it still applies today.

Are Books Your Seashell Collection?

I am honored to have had the chance to write for Desiring God. Just in case you missed it.

Looking forward to the Shane & Shane Christmas tour? Let this tie you over:

Are Believers and Unbelievers All That Different?

Jim was thirty-three, but the marvel in his eyes made him look like a toddler exploring new worlds. One searching look at his own pale white skin and then another look at the man lying on the bed. It was like looking in a mirror—but only a mirror that told the future.

The same hooked nose that stared at him in the mirror in the morning was the same one on the face of the man on the bed. He chuckled a little as he looked own and realized that at thirty-three he was already dressing like his grandfather—scraggily beard, flannel shirt, jeans that were on day three, and tennis shoes that had never seen a court.

“I’m just like him”, Jim thought to himself. 

Only he wasn’t.

Jim had breath in his lungs. His grandfather did not. Only moments before Jim’s old man in the mirror had breathed his last.

Though the two men are basically the same there is now a world of difference between them. A great chasm—if you will. No amount of comparing and contrasting will change that one unchangeable fact—one man is alive and the other is not.

The Difference in “Us”

I’ve noticed in recent days a sort of flattening that occurs when believers speak of unbelievers. “We are just like them”, says one pastor as he encourages his congregation to share the gospel. And he’s right. But he’s right in the same way that Jim was correct comparing his DNA with that of his grandfather.

But he’s also wrong.

“Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation. The old has passed away; behold, the new has come.”

There is actually a world of difference between a believer in Jesus and an unbeliever. And if that distinction is squashed we lose a great deal. Take for instance the promises of Romans 8:31-39. “If God is for us who can be against us…” That “us” is huge. It’s the difference between Jim and his lifeless grandfather.

If you are a believer you have new life. Yes, you sin just like unbelievers. Yes, you have the same burdens, the same dependency on grace for everything (whether you acknowledge it or not), and the same need for daily repentance. BUT your relationship to all of these things is vastly different than the relationship that an unbeliever has to them.

Flattening the distinction between believers and unbelievers might appear like a loving thing to do—it might seem like building a bridge for evangelism. But at the end of the day such a thing actually blows up the only bridge that can cross the great chasm between the spiritually dead and alive; namely, the work of Jesus Christ. If we aren’t fundamentally different than unbelievers then what exactly is this new life that Jesus Christ purchased for us?

No you are different. Let this truth drive us to our knees in awe and humility.

Today in Blogworld 11.25.13

The funniest moments of R13

If you like hearing stories of humorous ministry fails, then you’ll get a kick out of these videos.

A Brave Woman’s Response to “I Don’t Love You Anymore”

Wow.

The Constitution is Not Divinely Inspired

I appreciate this from my friend, Tom. “When elephants and donkeys drive our interpretation of the Bible, we have, indeed, ‘worshiped and served the creatures rather than the Creator.’”

Is it Actually Hard to Be a Pastor?

Very interesting discussion happening here.

I always wanted to try this. Not sure if I’m glad or not that I didn’t.

Does 1 Peter 3:18-20 Teach a Second Chance?

Martin Luther was a very confident and opinionated man. So when you read something like this it gives you pause:

“A wonderful text is this, and a more obscure passage perhaps than any other in the New Testament, so that I do not know for a certainty just what Peter means.”

The “wonderful text” that Luther referred to was 1 Peter 3:18-20. The most difficult part being verse 19, “in which [Christ] went and proclaimed to the spirits in prison”.

I had Mormons at my house the other day explaining that this verse taught that we have a second chance to receive the gospel after we are dead. They read this verse as saying that Jesus preached to spirits of men after they had died.

Is that true? If it’s not, what in the world is this verse talking about?

Context

The first question that we need to consider is why these verses are in our Bible in the first place. Peter didn’t just throw them in there for the fun of it. They are connected to what goes before and after. The word “for” in verse 18 is instructive. It means that what Peter says in this section is a ground—a reason for doing what is in the preceding verses.

In the preceding verses Peter is encouraging suffering believers to endure. Therefore, whatever interpretation of 3:18-20 that we adopt, it must provide help to suffering saints.

Options

There are four basic options to what this text is saying:

  1. Jesus was preaching by the Spirit through Noah to those trapped in sin during Noah’s day.
  2. Jesus went to the grave and liberated OT saints that were held in prison before his resurrection.
  3. Jesus descended into hell and preached to people, offering them the opportunity tot repent and be saved.
  4. Christ preached a message of victory and judgment upon evil angels.

The second and third options aren’t plausible because of the context. I find it difficult to see how the second view would be helpful to Christians suffering. Peter would be saying, “Persevere and continue in the faith because Jesus rescued OT saints in his resurrection.” The third is even more ridiculous. If accepted, Peter would be saying, “Persevere in suffering because you know that these unbelievers will be given a second chance to repent and believe”.

The first and fourth view would make sense of the context. The first one would be Peter saying, “Just as Noah was a minority and suffered under the hands of wicked men, but was also saved, so also you will be saved. Suffering is the way of Christ. It was true in Noah’s day and it’s true in ours. Therefore, endure.”

The fourth view would also make sense. Peter is showing how Christ has victory over evil angels. Therefore, in his victory over evil believers have hope. Knowing that the victory is won gives them hope to press on.

My Take

The context makes me lean towards the first interpretation. It’s also older, having been one proposed by Augustine. But there are some difficulties that make me wonder if the fourth option isn’t the best. One problem with the first view is that “spirits” is seldom a reference to people. Secondly, the first view doesn’t do justice to the word “went” or “has gone” (v.22) . As Schreiner notes, “God doesn’t really go anywhere if he preaches ‘through’ Noah”.

Either one of these are plausible in my opinion. At the end of the day our goal is to affirm that Jesus Christ is victorious. We also know that his victory comes through the path of suffering. Therefore, believers are to follow Christ in suffering on the road to glory. Because of the victory of Jesus we can endure, and we must!

Keep pressing on!