Today in Blogworld 10.23.14

22 Ways to Get a Better Night’s Sleep

I’m shocked that watch old episodes of Dragnet until you pass out isn’t on the list.

Some Uncomfortable Questions

Asking yourself these questions might also keep you from sleep. These are hard-hitting.

Faith To Keep Praying For Unbelieving Children

It’s easy to give up praying for beloved unbelievers—Mark Altrogge encourages us to keep going.

LOST at 10: Still Lost After All These Years

I got into Lost rather late, but I agree with Trevin’s assessment.

I’m gonna try a few of these fist bumps:

Does 1 John 2:27 Mean I Don’t Need My Sunday School Teacher?


In 1 John 2:27 the apostle tells his readers, “you have no need that anyone should teach you.” He says this because they have been “anointed by the Holy One”. As a result of this anointing they don’t need anyone to teach them.

What about us?

Is this an affirmation that if I have the “anointing of the Holy One” that I’m fine missing Sunday School? After all, if I’ve got God Almighty teaching my heart then, I don’t need nobody teachin’ me nuthin’.

What is the “anointing”?

In order to answer this question we first need to be clear on what this “anointing” is? I’ve heard some interpret this passage as if what John is saying is that some people receive direct revelations from the Spirit—and this is the anointing. And as a result, they don’t need teachers.

In actuality, such an interpretation would undercut John’s message. When we consider this verse in its context we see that John is likely dealing with a group of false teachers that are claiming special knowledge. They’ve abandoned the gospel. They haven’t “let what [they] heard from the beginning abide in [them]”.

Special messages that lead to a claim of special and/or secret knowledge from God is the very problem that John is facing. What John means when he says that they have been “anointed by the Holy One” is that they have been given the Holy Spirit. The consistent use of this word is “in relation to an anointing whose agent is God and whose medium is the Holy Spirit”. (Kruse, 103)

Because John’s readers have received the Holy Spirit they have within them all the knowledge they need. They don’t need something new or special. They simply need to remain faithful to the gospel that they’ve already received.

If I have the Spirit do I need teachers?

Why, then, does John say that his readers do not need anyone to teach them?

Again context is key. In verse 26 John says that he is writing these things “about those who are trying to deceive you”. It is contrast to these deceivers that John writes verse 27. His point, then, is that they already have what they need. So, when John says they do not need anyone to teach them the “anyone” is speaking of those giving new revelations.

We have the Spirit and we have gospel…we don’t need new stuff. So does this mean we don’t need teachers?

Absolutely not. It is the same Christ who gave the Spirit that also gave some to be teachers (Ephesians 4:11). It is hard to imagine that Christ would have gifted the church with teachers that we do not need.

In fact John is teaching them through his letter. But what ought to be noted is the way in which John is teaching them. This help us to see the function that teachers of the gospel are to have.

Gospel teachers aren’t new truth dispensers. We are dispensers of the very old truth. All believers are given the Spirit (that is John’s point) and when the gospel is proclaimed by teachers the Spirit within them affirms what is being taught.

And so this tells us how teachers ought to be teaching. Our goal is to lead people to a further grasp of the gospel. That’s it. You start teaching new and special things then nobody needs you as a teacher. But if you are a teacher that is laboring to help people grab hold of Jesus and apply the gospel then you are much needed in the kingdom.

Today in Blogworld 10.22.14

Christian, Don’t Begrudgingly Affirm God’s Word

Great word here from Aaron Armstrong.

The Pastor’s Wife Effect

How being like a pastor’s wife is like going around with a cat on your head.

Of Michael Landon and Brittany Maynard

An interesting contrast between the deaths of celebrity Michael Landon and social media sensation Brittany Maynard.

How Not to Argue: The Problem With Slipper Slopes

Here is why it is not helpful to use a slippery slope in your arguing.

B.J. Novak (Ryan from the Office) has an interesting new children’s book out:

If Jesus Walked Into a Bar Would Everybody Know His Name?


Better yet, if Jesus walked into a bar would the people there be glad that he came?

The popular notion of Jesus is that he’d walk into a bar and all the down and out sinners would greet him by name and give him a high-five. He’d be the most popular dude there—because you know sinners just couldn’t get enough of good ol’ JC.

I’m being facetious—but only slightly. My portrait isn’t terribly far off. What we’ve done is taken the insults of Pharisees (Matthew 11:19) and constructed an entire portrait of Jesus as a response. But I’ve yet to see a portrait painted of Jesus dabbling in dark magic because the Pharisees said he cast out demons by the power of Satan.

We’ve got Jesus high-fiving his bro’s and hanging out with hookers, when the truth is that his face was set like flint towards Golgotha. Truth is, he didn’t hang out with hookers because he really didn’t “hang out” with anybody. He discipled people. He built relationships with people. He served people and loved people and laughed with people. And he did this in the context of living a real life, but that is a far cry from his being a bar fly.

Our fad Jesus has caused us to shake our heads at statements like this from Spurgeon:

That very church which the world likes best is sure to be that which God abhors.

Chummy “Jesus” isn’t down with that quote. You see worldly people liked Chummy “Jesus”. If he was a popular dude, like we are led to believe, then either Spurgeon is wrong or God abhorred the ministry of Jesus.

Or maybe what needs to go is Chummy “Jesus”.

Please, don’t read me wrong. Jesus was (and is) a friend of sinners and quite likely was a breath of fresh air in comparison to the religious elite of his day. For he taught with authority and compassion. But let’s not forget that he was also quite off-putting. In John 6 a good amount of his disciples decided to leave him because he was saying hard things. And lets not forget that the crowd—likely filled with his former buds—shouted out a chorus of “Crucify Him!”

So if the church is going to follow in her Master’s footsteps then we would do well to set our eyes on the cross and not the latest opinion polls. Jesus might have had a season where he could walk into a bar and everybody would know his name. But those same people would crucify him a couple years later.

Thankfully, it was not our Lord’s mission to be liked. He didn’t die for his buds—he died for his enemies. And that’s the whole lot of us.