Ministry Without Pretense

I’m trying to relearn how to pray. And one of the resources I’m using is Paul Miller’s A Praying Life. One particular sentence stuck out to me the other day:

“Except for Judas, the disciples are without pretense.”

Miller’s point is that the Lord wants us to relate to Him without pretense. But I got to thinking about the disciples and how they would just say things to the Lord that they were feeling. This is why we laugh at James and John when they talk about burning down a whole city just because they got spurned. Or Peter who says that Scripture doesn’t apply to him and no matter what he isn’t going to abandon the Lord, and then denies him in front of a servant girl. We don’t give these things a nervous giggle because they are funny. We laugh because they are us. We remember being without pretense as children. And I’m convinced that somewhere in our muddied hearts we long to have that vulnerability again.

I thought about Judas too. I thought about his suggestion that they should have sold that ladies perfume and given it to the poor, but really his heart was seeing dollar signs after he took his greedy cut. That’s pretense—trying to make something that isn’t the case appear to be true.

Can We Do Ministry Without Pretense?

Paul Miller is correct, our relationship with the Lord should be without pretense. But why in the world does it feel like if you want to survive in pastoral ministry you’d better develop skills in pretense? Maybe it’s just my own spin on things, but it seems to me that a ton of ministry books/blogs advice is more like Judas’ speech and less like the disciples. Let me explain…

Last week Thom Rainer listed ten common sentiments pastors wish they could express. I found myself nodding to almost every one of those. But why are these sentiments that pastors wish they could express? I think part of it is because we have been trained that if we want to see change and growth and such happen in our church then we can’t be completely forthright.

We know that if we stand before our congregation and say, “I’m so tired of attending mundane meetings” that such a confession will be costly. Costly doesn’t necessarily mean that folks will respond poorly, it just means that such a statement will inevitably create a withdraw out of our relational equity account. And so rather than simply saying, without pretense, “we should stop having mundane meetings”, the pastor has to work the system to create institutional change.

My friend, Dave Miller, explains it this way:

There is, in every church a Pastor’s Authority and Credibility Bank which contains the capital the pastor needs to lead the church – his pastoral authority, his credibility as a leader, his job security and his ability to cast a vision and set the direction of the church. Every day of his ministry the pastor makes deposits and withdrawals from the bank. The key to effective ministry is for the pastor to regularly and consistently make more deposits than he does withdrawals! (In essence, that is just another way of saying he is there to serve, not to be served.)

I agree with Dave that this exists, but I think it’s problematic. It just is. But I wish it wasn’t so, because this is why we feel like we cannot minister without pretense. We expend all of our energy trying to please people and keep those withdraws at a minimum and deposits at a maximum so that we can be about the Lord’s work. And it’s very easy in these times to walk in pretense and call it “wisdom”. We realize we cannot really please everyone but maybe we can keep the damage to a minimum. A good minister, I’ve been told, will lead the congregation in such a way that they think his ideas are their ideas. (That doesn’t seem very authentic, does it?)

When all this happens we lose our center. We become more like pagan priests than gospel ministers. When we “fall prey to those insecure moments when we allow the approval and disdain of our congregations to define us” our goals for ministry change. It becomes less about the gospel and more about “making people happy or avoiding their wrath”. This is why David Rohrer calls us people-pleasing pastors “pagan priests”, because “our primary ministry ministry becomes making sacrifices to the gods of our congregation that either beseech their approval or divert their anger”. (Rohrer, 72)

It feels like we cannot do ministry without pretense. But we must…

Conclusion:

Pretense doesn’t mean that you say everything that is on your mind. There is wisdom in being patient and plodding. But there is also a type of “wisdom” that is more serpentine than faithful. Pastors shouldn’t be manipulative or underhanded in our attempts to cast vision within the church. We should be able to say, straight-faced, with Paul:

“we have renounced disgraceful, underhanded ways. We refuse to practice cunning or to tamper with God’s word, but by the open statement of the truth we would commend ourselves to everyone’s conscience in the sight of God.” –2 Corinthians 4:2

It’s risky to minister without pretense. But we have this ministry by the mercy of God and so we labor in that knowledge. Is ministry without pretense possible? I sure hope so. I can’t imagine that God would call us to be and act with our congregation in a way that is not consistent with how we are to relate to Him.

—

Photo source: here

Read This! 04.27.17

The Quiet Plague of Painkillers

Glad to see this addressed.

On Writing, Branding, and Platform-Building

There is a helpful conversation going on about this topic. Also check out Karen Swallow Prior’s reflections.

Are You Experiencing FOMO?

I want to write more about this in the future.

Do Paul and James Disagree on Justification Alone?

A Tom Schreiner article. You know what to do…

John Bunyan and the Hidden Perils of Preaching

This was really encouraging to me. I’m not alone.

10 Common Sentiments Pastors Wish They Could Express

Yeah, I think I’d agree with these.

Is the Enemy of My Enemy My Friend?

Good question, appreciate the last sentence.

8 Departure Dangers from Gospel-Centrality

This was convicting to me.

An epic dad joke duel:

Is That Relationship Really Toxic?

I’m working on a translation of the Bible more suitable to the Christianity that is comfortable to practice. Here is my suggestion for Matthew 5:23-24:

“So if you are offering your gift at the altar and there remember that your brother has something against you, leave your gift there before the altar and go. First be reconciled to your brother, and then come and offer your gift. Unless of course this is one of those ‘toxic people’ that nobody can please. And then it is absolutely understandable that you have a fractured relationship. In this case leave your gift and let the toxic person go on to his destruction.”

I like that a bit better. It fits a bit better with what I keep hearing about the dangers of toxic people within the body of Christ. This also makes it incredibly easy to not actually have to deal with broken relationships. It’s also pretty easy to identify toxic people.

I took an online quiz that really helped me determine all the toxic people in my life. Basically anyone who impacts me negatively, causes me to dread being around them, challenges my deeply held beliefs, exhausts me, creates drama, makes me feel bad about myself, or hurts my feelings is probably a toxic person. And I don’t need them in my life. They won’t help me fulfill my dreams or become the person that God has called me to be. They’ll just drag me down.

Now, you must know I’ve only partially got my tongue in my cheek. I believe there really is such a thing as a toxic person and the Bible really does tell us to avoid them. The problem, though, is that we’ve taken the world’s definition of toxicity and applied it to biblical passages. We’ve cast off genuinely struggling folks onto the island of toxicity and managed to be our own version of Pontius Pilate, washing our hands of the whole mess. But if we want to be faithful to the Bible we need to consider whether or not someone actually is toxic before we give them the boot.

I think I’ve come up with a helpful set of questions to determine whether or not someone actually is toxic.

First, is this actually a big deal?

We are an easily offendable bunch. It’s not beyond us to consider somebody toxic just because they get on our nerves. It’s also not beyond us to put unbiblical expectations on people and then lash out in anger when they fail to meet them. If I really think I’m in a relationship with a toxic person I have to be able to show that this is a pattern in their life and it’s something that the Scriptures actually consider a big deal. Uncle Leroy’s refusal to stop eating his own toenails doesn’t make him toxic, it makes him disgusting. But I don’t have a right to make a big deal out of this. If it’s not a big deal then I have to consider that I’m looking for specks and ignoring a log in my own eye.

But if it is a big deal…

Secondly, does this person know about it?

This is where we most often misstep. Scripture is clear that we aren’t permitted to simply end relationships just because someone has offended us or because we now consider them toxic. There is a process to this, and at the front end of this process is actually confronting the person with their sin. If you’ve ended a relationship because you thought somebody was toxic but you never told them this, then you aren’t totally innocent in this fractured relationship. (This doesn’t mean that you can’t take somebody else with you or even confront through someone else in issues of abuse). They might be toxic. You might need to end the relationship. But you can’t truly know that until you confront them. Because you have to be able to at least somewhat answer this…

Thirdly, are they repentant or rebellious?

At this point we make a sharp turn from most of the advice you are going to read on the internet about dealing with toxic people. In the Scriptures truly toxic people—those who are really to be avoided—are marked by one chief characteristic; namely, a stubborn and obstinate heart that refuses to submit to God.

2 Timothy 3 gives an outline of the type of wicked people who we’d call toxic.

But understand this, that in the last days there will come times of difficulty. 2 For people will be lovers of self, lovers of money, proud, arrogant, abusive, disobedient to their parents, ungrateful, unholy,3 heartless, unappeasable, slanderous, without self-control, brutal, not loving good, 4 treacherous, reckless, swollen with conceit, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, 5 having the appearance of godliness, but denying its power. Avoid such people.

But what really marks a person off as toxic is their stubborn and obstinate heart. This is what causes such a one to be broken beyond repair (Proverbs 29:1). It is this type of heart that causes Scripture to repeatedly command believers to avoid contentious people (see Titus 3). The truly toxic person isn’t going to change—not because change isn’t possible but because of his obstinate refusal to find rescue in Jesus.

I do things that are in that list in 2 Timothy 3. But it isn’t who I am. When I find myself loving pleasure more than loving God, the Spirit grieves my heart and I run to him for rescue. If the toxic people in your life are truly regenerate then they’ll eventually move towards redemption instead of rebellion. They’ll hate their sin and agree with you that their toxic behavior needs to change. The truly toxic, won’t. They’ll remain stubborn and obstinate in their sin.

If the answer to this question is “yes”, then you are called by Scripture to avoid such a person (at least after a season of pursuing their repentance). But just because they are repentant it doesn’t mean the end of the story. We need to ask at least one more question…

Is this a burden for you to carry?

You may truly not be in a position to walk through the fire with someone. You might have your own particular issues and struggles and unique temptations that means you need to not be the one carrying this burden. I truly believe that if you smell a skunk in the road that it’s now your problem. But that doesn’t mean that I have to be the one to clean it up.

For example, I’m probably not the best person to help a female walk through her struggle with lust. But that doesn’t mean that I’m not responsible for helping her find someone who might be more suited. In the same way there might be a person who, for a whole host of reasons, causes me extreme anxiety to counsel. I don’t have to be the one to carry that burden. I can find other help in the body of Christ.

But perhaps the Lord will show me that this “toxic person” isn’t really a toxic person at all. They are a sinner. A very difficult sinner. Perhaps a sinner who is so wrapped up in the effects of sin that they are really hard to love. Maybe this is a sinner who is going to sin against me and wound me and hurt me a thousand times over, but I’m still called to walk through the fire with them as we both find redemption in Jesus.

We don’t have biblical justification for ending relationships because they are difficult or because they hurt us. We cannot confine someone to the island of toxicity because they are particularly difficult and/or prone to sins which tend to hurt others. If they are truly repentant and truly wanting redemption in Jesus (no matter how sloppily) then we are called by God to somehow help them through.

—

Photo source: here

Read This! 04.25.17

What We Gained When We Lost Our Hymnals

A few weeks ago Tim posted the other side to this. I appreciate this view as well.

On Christian “Platforming”

This was a good thing to read and well worth considering.

A Letter From N.D. Wilson

Please pray for this brother.

5 Questions Leaders Should Be Asking All the Time

Good advice.

On Family Worship and Failure

I needed to read this. It is so hard for us to get consistent in this area.

10 Questions For Pastors and Polemics

This is really good.

Beware of Broken Wolves

This is real. “These are the false teachers who use their own authenticity, pain, and brokenness to attract believers who are also suffering and broken—and then using their “brokenness” to lead the sheep to turn away from God’s Word and embrace sin.”

A Hill to Die On

That Douglas Wilson quote in the article is phenomenal.

8 Reasons Church Conflicts Often Burn Out of Control Quickly

Helpful analogy.

Dr. Wellum was one of my favorite professors, here he answers a good question: