Borrowed Light: Today in Blogworld 03/20-24

Mike Leake

Wyman Richardson posts an eight-year old interview with Timothy George. (Note that the interview is 8 years old, not the person giving the interview). It is an excellent resource. I particularly like this quote: I sometimes think, “Am I a five-point Calvinist?” I like to think I’m a “66-point” Calvinist because I think it’s in every book of the Bible. But, in one sense, there’s only one point, and that is that God is the source of our salvation from first to last. And if you believe that, then the points become ways of understanding or explaining this or that dimension of it but not a rigid grid through which everything has to be filtered. (HT: Founders)
Find out how $20 can supply fresh water to one person in Africa for 20 years. Lord willing, I will be giving 20 bucks to this cause, consider doing the same.

Phil Johnson continues his series on contextualization. Read part two here.

For those in the Puritan Reading Challenge, Timmy Brister provides an update. The April book will be Burroughs’ Rare Jewel instead of Brooks’ work.

For those that do not like the “Calvinistic tendencies” on this blog, Gordan Runyan has provided you a service: Defeating Calvinistic-blogs. Feel free to cut and paste as necessary.

Sorry I didn’t give you this link sooner. Tim Challies discusses becoming a better apologizer.

Great post by Rhett on Altar Calls: The New Sacrament. I have been saying this for quite some time. In fact I have wanted to put together several posts comparing modern evangelicalism (or, heck, even Southern Baptist) with Roman Catholicism.

C.J. Mahaney and Jeff Purswell again treat us to the Leadership Series Interviews. Check out the latest installment on the Early-Morning Spiritual Battles.

Dan Phillips discusses Tim Keller’s way of preaching on hell. It is an interesting article. I’m not sure if I agree more with Keller or Phillips. (My style probably matches Phillips, however). Be sure to read it and check out the comments too.

Tournament News, Blog Tourney, and Other Updates

Mike Leake

It has been a difficult, exhausting, yet, inspiring Easter weekend. All good Christian bloggers should post over the Easter holiday. I didn’t. My wife and I were in St. Louis at the hospital with her dying grandmother. We aren’t certain that she knows Jesus. Please pray for her soul and for her body. The Lord has been patient for 80-something years. He would be just to take her at anytime. However, we pray for his mercy.

In the category of incomparably stinky news, my tournament bracket is shot. Someone must have slipped me some crack or something in my Mountain Dew. I picked way too many upsets. What idiot picks Boise St. over Louisville? Me! Dumb. Seriously, what was I thinking?

In other “tournament” news I was very stoked to find out that I made the Blog Madness at SBC Voices. I am seeded 11th in the South Division. The top 4 in each division advance. It would be a major upset for Borrowed Light to make it into the second round. With your votes we could do so. If you want to vote for us go here and vote. No way we advance beyond the second round. But even being in the sweet 16 would be a huge honor.

Embracing the Whore

Mike Leake

I am listening to Derek Webb right now. Personally, I liked his earlier stuff better, but that is beside the point. Webb has always been a little controversial. Do you remember the whole fiasco about his use of the word “whore” on his amazing song Wedding Dress? “Well I am a whore I do confess, and I put you on just like a wedding dress, and I run down the aisle, to you”. Do you remember the ban that some (actually it might have been many) Christian book stores had on Webb’s album? Many of you probably have no clue what I am talking about, because you have never heard the CD, because it got pulled from your Christian music store. Here is the point. If you are Abraham Piper and you want only 22 words here it is:

Do you find it ironic that we threw the “prophet” out of our Christian bookstores while embracing the whore that he denounced?

The Godly Man’s Picture Chapter 4 (Part 2)

Mike Leake 3 Comments

As noted previously, this is the longest chapter in the book. Therefore , we will be breaking it up into approximately 10 different parts. Today you will be treated to the second part, where we will cover the godly man moved by faith and fired by love for God.

The Canvas:

The most oft used brush in the masterpiece of a godly man is the brush of faith. Watson goes on a passionate, almost Pauline, discourse about the preciousness of faith. Faith, says Watson, “cuts us off from the wild olive of nature, and grafts us into Christ.” It also, “is the vital artery of the soul…the mother of hope…the ground of patience.” It “excites to repentance” and “enlivens graces”. He sums this section up well when he says, “the life of a saint is nothing but a life of faith”.

As Watson encourages us to “test ourselves by this characteristic” he paints a rather bleak picture of the condition of faith in England during his time. If we have not faith we are not godly. The question, then, that Watson is asking in this section is simple; do you have faith?

Our author makes a beautiful choice placing the “fire” of love for God after faith. Can you really separate the two? As Watson says, “faith and love are the two poles on which all religion turns”. And again, “As faith enlivens, so love sweetens every duty”. This section is Watson’s confession that he is a Christian Hedonist, and that John Piper did not invent it (wink wink). He asks such pointed questions as, “is he our treasure and centre”? “Do we love him for his beauty more than his jewels?” Then he says something that pricks my heart…”Many court him, but few love him”. Watson’s main contention in this section is that if we are devoid of love for God, then we cannot truly be said to be godly.

Discussion:

Perhaps this question is inappropriate and will lead to endless abuse of Jesus’ bride…with trepidation I ask it. What would you consider the state of “faith” in our nation? What about our churches? What about your church? What about your own soul?

After reading Richard Sibbes and remembering some of his quotes about “pitching matters too high”, do you feel that Watson may sometimes do this? I am curious to hear a response to this from others that have read both books.

When Watson says “many court him, but few love him”, how might we be guilty of “courting him” instead of loving him?

Strokes of Genius:

“A life of a saint is nothing but a life of faith” (p29)

“As faith enlivens, so love sweetens every duty” (p30)

“A godly man loves God and therefore delights to be in his presence; he loves God and therefore takes comfort in nothing without him.” (p30)

“Many court him, but few love him.” (p31)

On to Part 3…